- Mon Jan 28, 2019 10:33 pm
#31605
Thanks for the clearification, what if i run a HALL-sensor as CAS? would that help? or am i totally under the buss? Would it be a bitch to add this as a "Custom wheel" like it has been done on other?
PSIG wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 6:16 pmlinkus wrote: ↑Mon Jan 28, 2019 2:12 pmHmm are you sure? last time i checked the clio 172 runs the same pattern, and all other ecu's detect that as a 60-2 pattern i even think that ivanro_jo on slack have it running with this kind of trigger.It would not read correctly in "standard" form, with a "correct" polarity VR sensor, reading the trailing (falling) edges of the teeth in order to properly read the missing teeth and to avoid signal drift. That said, and reading only the rising edge, it could be seen as a 60-2 — but I would experiment in order to determine whether a reverse-polarity sensor output vs leading edge detection results in less timing drift and proper gap detection. Fingers crossed!
. . .
Also strange when i asked the reseller about the triggerpattern they said like this
"It’s a standard Clio 172 / 182 trigger pattern 60-2 so is compatible with most, if not all aftermarket ecus."
David
It would have been great if the + and - teeth placement were reversed, or the engine rotation reversed "Honda" style.
CLIO_teeth.jpg
Thanks for the clearification, what if i run a HALL-sensor as CAS? would that help? or am i totally under the buss? Would it be a bitch to add this as a "Custom wheel" like it has been done on other?