Yachtsman wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 6:38 pm
klotzy_550 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 4:55 pm
Yachtsman wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:41 pm
I'm using a tablet and it takes me 1\2 hour to login the first time. So l logged in with Facebook quickly
Maybe you can tune the engine quicker with Facebook too !
Funny!
You can't counter the fact of an ethanol engine s greater thermodynamic efficiency so you're reduced to being flippant.
I have never said that it would be less thermodyncamically efficient, I have argued that you are at an energy deficit that your thermo gains are not overcoming, you just are too ignorant to utilize the math, science, and physics that has been given to you. Might as well be unrealistic if you are going to be!
I mean you still struggle to understand the fundamentals. I.e.: dynamic compression, heat transfer / loss, reduction in volumetric efficiency, stoichiometery, potential energy, volume vs mass, and tuning, just to name a few.
The thing is, you are hinging your entire project on a study that was never completed, merely speculated, in the early 1990's. Not sure if you noticed but that was nearly 30 years ago bud.
"Arguing with an Engineer is a lot like wrestling in the mud with a pig. After a couple of hours you realize the pig likes it."