- Wed Jun 01, 2022 4:10 pm
#57247
Every choice is a set of compromises, and the lack of ignition control can be very limiting unless it is a short intermediate step to a full conversion. Choose wisely. While it may appear that fuel-only is simpler to convert, in other ways a full conversion allows the operation and tuning to be simpler and more effective as they are coordinated. Fuel and spark work as a team to extract energy, and controlling only one limits the capabilities. Still, some lesser gains can be made, limited by the one you do not control. Make your informed choices and set your plan.
Yes, the injection timing will shift with the independent ignition pulses, but that is less important than if you were to shift timing randomly. Either allow injection to shift timing, or take control of ignition timing. The goals of your conversion will help dictate which path is better. For further discussion, please start your own threads, so the OP's thread is not hijacked further.
zwelsh91 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:33 am I have a 1981 Rabbit Pickup that I am attempting the same Fuel Only conversion on. … I am keen to learn about using the distributor for the ignition trigger.In fuel-only conversion, the ignition portion is simply ignored.
zwelsh91 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:33 amIf one is using just the output from the destributor hall sensor to trigger ignition on the speeduino , how do you address ignition timing advance (mechanical and vacuum).In fuel-only conversion, the stock ignition operates dwell timing and advance independently. Only the distributor pulses are shared in order for Speeduino to sense rpm, calculate, and time fuel events. Addressing ignition timing advance is not fuel-only, and is a fuel & ignition conversion. Choose your path so you do not become confused by the different options. We are assuming by your statement that it is to be fuel-only.
Every choice is a set of compromises, and the lack of ignition control can be very limiting unless it is a short intermediate step to a full conversion. Choose wisely. While it may appear that fuel-only is simpler to convert, in other ways a full conversion allows the operation and tuning to be simpler and more effective as they are coordinated. Fuel and spark work as a team to extract energy, and controlling only one limits the capabilities. Still, some lesser gains can be made, limited by the one you do not control. Make your informed choices and set your plan.
zwelsh91 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:33 amDoes one lockout the advance in the distributor and let speeduino handle the advance or …Again, in a fuel-only conversion, the stock system operates independently without other change. Commonly, these are "piggyback" conversions, allowing the original ECM to handle everything but fuel injectors. Speeduino simply watches the distributor signal for fuel functions.
Yes, the injection timing will shift with the independent ignition pulses, but that is less important than if you were to shift timing randomly. Either allow injection to shift timing, or take control of ignition timing. The goals of your conversion will help dictate which path is better. For further discussion, please start your own threads, so the OP's thread is not hijacked further.
-= If it was easy, everyone would do it =-