pazi88 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 6:00 amThe problem mainly is that the MAP value updates too slowly because of the averaging. … with filtering turned off or to very minimum, gives really good AE response on lower RPM. But at higher RPM the MAP reading has huge spikes …
We have debated reading frequency and filtering/averaging for a long time with single fixed values for each, and solutions seem to be workarounds. Any chance a pair of taper or table settings for a (any) single mode could be employed (like others we have)? Filtering or averaging is a single setting for all conditions. E.g., TPS Filtering > Filter Level MAP/TPS/RPM > x to y > off-low-med-high … or simple table, switches, or some such interface?
While your solution is certainly functional, if
Cycle Average is simply too averaged at low speeds, we could adjust level at increments? Perhaps this could avoid the issues for each case, and allow the best mode or modifier for the functional results of any specific engine setup, I'm thinking? Thoughts?
[EDIT] I'm hoping this concept could be used to fit other IO, such as signal input, where one size (setting) does not fit all.
We use strength, range and taper for other stuff like AE or WUE, why not for others?