panpan wrote:I managed a better torque curve with EFI presumably because with EFI I could more accurately set the fueling curve and achieve a closer to optimum Lambda throughout the full rev range.@TZ350 Possibly, but one thing to watch for is ignition advance differences. You might already know that retarding the ignition around the hp peak, will make the exhaust temperature rise in the pipe, increasing exhaust gas speed in the pipe, which the engine sees as a shorter pipe because of the earlier resonance coming back, and so the hp curve hangs up for longer. Mike
Hi Mike, thanks for the thoughts. The back to back test was done without changing the ignition settings. The bike runs an Ignitec digital DC-CDI programmable ignition. Basically the test was done by just turning the fuel on to the carb or turning the power on for the EFI CPU. Both fueling curves had previously been tuned best as I could.
But you are right I could bend the curve with the ignition, a trick I often use to extend the over rev in the manner you describe. Anyway I have spent quite a bit of time trying to get the best out of both carbs and fuel injection and one thing for sure is that fuel injection is way easier to get wide open throttle fueling right.
panpan wrote:Also watch that long "snorkel" on the end of the carburetor, as I found they have a way of restricting the airflow.
When I looked at TPS vis AirFlow through the throttle I was sucking air through the motor with a big vacuum cleaner. Probably not the most scientifically competent result but I was looking to get some idea of the relation ship to help me understand EFI maps.