Note — you likely already know a lot of this, but I describe stuff so other new users reading the thread can follow as well.
HayBurner408G wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:22 amMT07s make similar power to approximately half the output of what I aim and think is achievable with the bottom end I have built.
Fortunately, oversized airflow is not a functional issue but a response (driver sensitivity) issue, so you may find progressive throttle linkage is desired. Also, just as with the other components the required airflow will be met at a partial throttle opening, so your VE Table resolution will be smaller, non-common plenum will tend to have less MAP resolution, TPS will have limited effective range, and other side effects. The injectors as @LAV100 stated will be very oversized, with again less resolution. I have no quarrel with any of it — it's your project.
Just outlining side-effects that you may not have considered that you are choosing that can be obstacles to performance, tuning and operation. Compromise where you like and to the extent you are comfortable, but you only get so many sloppy choices in a setup, from injector sizing to timing resolution to fuel grade, before it bites you and goes from great to so-so.
HayBurner408G wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:22 amUse a VDO CHT sender or whatever I can nab at scrappy, same for IAT (drill and tap for a bung to go into air box/breathers?)
Another option is any K-type thermocouple +
AD8495 =
There are other sources for the AD8495 board, but the info there is good. Install the AD8495 with power from your proto area, output to the CLT input, and calibrate in TS. Range is well over the VDO sensors and what you may need for CHT. Generally, a common CHT ring (under spark plug) sensor is used for best response and relative numbers, though other types can be used with consideration.
Ring_CHT_T-couple.png (43.38 KiB) Viewed 7389 times
HayBurner408G wrote: ↑Thu Sep 12, 2019 9:22 amthink I could squeeze a 1L surge tank underneath that is gravity fed by the tank and then to the pump (so all will sit below the fuel tank to keep a pressure head) I will run a return line the same route as the feed (can you have it exit in the bottom of the tank also (with some sort of 1 way valve?) or into the filler neck.. fuel pressure regulator just before engine bay then to a common fuel rail which will serve both cylinder banks by teeing to each pair of throttle bodies (equal distance between)
If i understand your description correctly; the regulator would typically go after the fuel rails, returning any fuel not used to the surge tank. Feed can be to one rail and then the other (then the regulator), or tee both before and after to split the feed to and from the two rails.
The small fuel modules such as @LAV1000 mentioned for TRX680, VT750, VT1300, etc, are very handy, but be sure to get the connector for it and the quick-disconnect fuel fitting.
A small accumulator/surge tank fed by the stock fuel pump might be an option to keep-up with the HP pump flow. 120hp needs a 50lph pump (fuel pump calc's
here), and 50/60/4=.2L (7 fluid ounces) is the fuel you need in your surge tank to feed that full power for 15 seconds without
any fuel from the tank. I know, rare, but it may as well be bulletproof.
A soda can-sized tank will take you for almost half a minute at WOT if your main tank is near empty, sloshes away from the outlet, and you go for a blast. Looking at those numbers, one of the billet oil catch cans could be a plug 'n play surge tank.
If gravity feed with an up-sized tank outlet, consider the return to a high point in order to prevent the gravity head pressure from inhibiting return bubbles. Hope that helps.
David
An accumulator/surge tank I made from a truck fuel filter assembly, modified with a bottom pickup tube and 3rd port opened. It happily fed a turbo V8: